Note: This forum is merely an archive. It is no longer possible to register or post. - StackOverflow
New Ace of Spades Forums: http://buildandshoot.com/

0.76 Discussion

For all things AoS!

Re: 0.76 Discussion

Postby Fluttershy » Fri Aug 17, 2012 4:02 pm

MoleMan wrote:You forgot falloff at range. It's now lethal at close range, but weaker at long. I wish the falloff were a bit higher, or the accuracy a bit lower, though, as I still can use my SMG to snipe.

And they changed rifle ammo from 5 to 8? What the duck?


That would be implying falloff is actually noticeable, when the servers actually showed the falloff it was never more than 5 damage being lost, with it usually being like, .8 or something. Unless he increased falloff or something, which he hasnt afaik.
User avatar
Fluttershy
Member
 
Posts: 979
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 5:13 am

Re: 0.76 Discussion

Postby UNDERCOVER » Fri Aug 17, 2012 4:17 pm

Fluttershy wrote:
MoleMan wrote:You forgot falloff at range. It's now lethal at close range, but weaker at long. I wish the falloff were a bit higher, or the accuracy a bit lower, though, as I still can use my SMG to snipe.

And they changed rifle ammo from 5 to 8? What the duck?


That would be implying falloff is actually noticeable, when the servers actually showed the falloff it was never more than 5 damage being lost, with it usually being like, .8 or something. Unless he increased falloff or something, which he hasnt afaik.
Uh, heh, that's one of the things...

I did some damage fall off testing on the RC10 servers.

At fogline distance, a shot in the chest would do around 29 less damage points.

However, at close range, the rifle's damage has been increased dramatically, so Ben probably did this to even up the rifle.

I really like it.
tunaspirit wrote:So AoS is an actual army simulator?
I never knew Marines were fighting THAT much terrorist polaks and brazilians.
User avatar
UNDERCOVER
Member
 
Posts: 395
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 11:36 am
Location: Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Re: 0.76 Discussion

Postby ChaosTLW » Fri Aug 17, 2012 7:00 pm

UNDERCOVER wrote:
ei8htx wrote:I just tried out RC10. I don't see any difference.
The ROF is the same as 0.75's ROF, and the rifle does more damage to chest/legs.

The ammo ratio is now 8/48.

Perfect rifle is perfect.

RoF should be nerfed, and 8/10 is unnecesary, I think a 6 or 7 magazine would be better.
#1 most active member
Image

We are here because the Universe offers conditions so life can evolve,to the point where(at least one)species,in a small planet around a star lost between millions of galaxies,is able to ask itself:What was my origin? (M. Gleiser)
User avatar
ChaosTLW
Member
 
Posts: 2981
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 2:17 am

Re: 0.76 Discussion

Postby Crockturtle566 » Fri Aug 17, 2012 7:22 pm

i think i know what the rifle in ace of spades is. Ruger 1022
I'm not trying to kill you its just your walking wear my bullets are going...
User avatar
Crockturtle566
Member
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 8:48 pm

Re: 0.76 Discussion

Postby XFrostByteX » Fri Aug 17, 2012 11:24 pm

Crockturtle566 wrote:i think i know what the rifle in ace of spades is. Ruger 1022

The rifle isn't a ruger 1022, the rifle is just, a rifle. Not supposed to be any particular rifle.
User avatar
XFrostByteX
Member
 
Posts: 317
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 8:55 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: 0.76 Discussion

Postby ChaosTLW » Sat Aug 18, 2012 1:30 am

XFrostByteX wrote:
Crockturtle566 wrote:i think i know what the rifle in ace of spades is. Ruger 1022

The rifle isn't a ruger 1022, the rifle is just, a rifle. Not supposed to be any particular rifle.

Actually it is modeled after the M14, as far as I know. The SMG is modeled after the MP5, and the shotgun is modeled after the 60s Remington 870.
#1 most active member
Image

We are here because the Universe offers conditions so life can evolve,to the point where(at least one)species,in a small planet around a star lost between millions of galaxies,is able to ask itself:What was my origin? (M. Gleiser)
User avatar
ChaosTLW
Member
 
Posts: 2981
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 2:17 am

Re: 0.76 Discussion

Postby superdrew » Sat Aug 18, 2012 9:25 pm

the rifle should keep the accuracy that it has now BUT if you are crouching and moving it would have 85% accuracy and if you are crouching and staying still it would have 98% accuracy. it should NEVER have 100% because then it would be extremely op and it would be the only gun people would ever use. shotgun should have a serious buff, and smg should stay exactly were it is but with slightly less headshot damage. a pistol should be added with 7 shots that shoots a little faster then the rifle but has a 3 shot headshot 4 shot body and 5 shot legs. as for the rpg/medic kit when choosing your weapon, after choosing team and weapon you should have a choice between 3 grenades OR an rpg with 2 shots OR 2 medic kits that heal 30 points. that is where I stand
I AM BACK
User avatar
superdrew
Member
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 2:12 pm

Re: 0.76 Discussion

Postby JocksOnHaterz » Sun Aug 19, 2012 12:24 am

superdrew wrote:the rifle should keep the accuracy that it has now BUT if you are crouching and moving it would have 85% accuracy and if you are crouching and staying still it would have 98% accuracy. it should NEVER have 100% because then it would be extremely op and it would be the only gun people would ever use. shotgun should have a serious buff, and smg should stay exactly were it is but with slightly less headshot damage. a pistol should be added with 7 shots that shoots a little faster then the rifle but has a 3 shot headshot 4 shot body and 5 shot legs. as for the rpg/medic kit when choosing your weapon, after choosing team and weapon you should have a choice between 3 grenades OR an rpg with 2 shots OR 2 medic kits that heal 30 points. that is where I stand

I agree completely.
I make mods! Check 'em out!

Balls fucker!
-Birgirpall
User avatar
JocksOnHaterz
Member
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 12:35 am
Location: Where pictures aren't allowed

Re: 0.76 Discussion

Postby Commodore » Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:14 am

No the rifle should have ALWAYS 100% because it is specially created for that.

And btw, what do we have the game suggestions for?
IGN: Commodore T.M.N
Commodore
Member
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 9:34 am

Re: 0.80 Ideas

Postby HunSkin » Fri Aug 24, 2012 8:27 am

IrishElf wrote:
2. Gun Customization
Weapon attachments and proficiencies (gulp!) like in CoD. This is one of the only things that was done right in MW3, and I don't see any downsides.


Ben has difficulty keeping three weapons balanced, you seriously think that it'll be any better with a trillion and a half customization options?

Yep.
Image
User avatar
HunSkin
Member
 
Posts: 59
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 2:33 pm

Re: 0.80 Ideas

Postby Venator » Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:47 am

HunSkin wrote:
IrishElf wrote:
2. Gun Customization
Weapon attachments and proficiencies (gulp!) like in CoD. This is one of the only things that was done right in MW3, and I don't see any downsides.


Ben has difficulty keeping three weapons balanced, you seriously think that it'll be any better with a trillion and a half customization options?

Yep.

Image
User avatar
Venator
[SPQR] Member
 
Posts: 729
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2012 7:56 pm
Location: the free candy van

Re: 0.80 Ideas

Postby Sniper101 » Fri Aug 24, 2012 10:17 am

Venator wrote:
HunSkin wrote:Yep.

Image

A bit of both, I suppose.
ImageImage
User avatar
Sniper101
[DELTA] Member
 
Posts: 1864
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 1:38 pm
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Re: 0.76 Discussion

Postby ei8htx » Fri Aug 24, 2012 11:39 am

Don't be a dick, we all have our opinions.
User avatar
ei8htx
Member
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 4:58 am
Location: US West Coast

Re: 0.76 Discussion

Postby Sniper101 » Fri Aug 24, 2012 11:54 am

I am sorry for hurting your extremely valuable opinion. ;_;
ImageImage
User avatar
Sniper101
[DELTA] Member
 
Posts: 1864
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 1:38 pm
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Re: 0.76 Discussion

Postby ei8htx » Fri Aug 24, 2012 12:13 pm

My opinion is that weapon customization is a bad idea, which I believe is the same as yours.

One doesn't need to attack persons who hold a different opinion with stupid pictures and accusations of trolling. The convenience of online anonymity can empower otherwise shy individuals into being aggressive or bullying. Others simply haven't mastered etiquette and social skills due to their age/maturity.

Speaking in a public setting can be difficult. Here's a step-by-step process you may find useful if you suffer from the latter:

http://www.wikihow.com/Have-a-Great-Conversation
User avatar
ei8htx
Member
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 4:58 am
Location: US West Coast

PreviousNext

Return to Ace of Spades Discussion



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest